Wet hunky goodness!
« Two weeks post-op | Main | »
September 25, 2011
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Search
Follow me on Twitter...
Recent Posts
Friends, Bloggers, Countrymen
Where the Boys Are
Knitting Blogs
1000 Knitters Project
Disclaimer
WoolGatherer claims no rights to the images of models posted on this blog. If the owner(s) of the respective images do not wish for their work to be displayed on this site, the photos will be removed upon emailed request.
All opinions expressed on this blog, no matter how ridiculous or perverse, are solely those of the author.
He is very, very hot. It's a shame the picture wasn't taken from a little farther away, if you know what I mean. Plus, Michael's got a really good point. He's got to be a little bit hairier around the chest.
Posted by: Alex | December 31, 2011 at 03:57 PM
He is definately attractive, although I agree with Michael... I like a well groomed guy, but I think he would look better if it wasn't trimmed so short.
Posted by: Andy | September 29, 2011 at 01:20 PM
Very much so.....I do wonder why the "industry" thinks that hairiness is bad though......thus the "trim". :)
Posted by: Michael | September 25, 2011 at 01:28 PM